See original post and follow up discussion on /r/slatestarcodex here
Recently, I have been reflecting on the idea of career success.
Specifically, there are individuals I know who have achieved success that I never anticipated, as well as a larger number of people I did expect to succeed but have not made any significant impact.
I don’t mean success in the context of living a fulfilled life or having a good job, but success in the context of becoming rich and/or influential.
For context, I am in my early 30s. I grew up in a very wealthy community in Toronto filled with lots of smart people.
When I was younger, I had this belief that I had a good sense of who, among those I knew, would become successful.
I thought success would follow two forms:
Either:
- Be smart and hardworking > go to the best school/program you can > get the most prestigious job you can > work hard, climb the path and excel.
- People who are exceptionally talented would be recognized as such and be provided an alternative path, more likely to lead to success.
I have a good job in the conventional sense (for someone living in Canada), but am very far from being rich, powerful or notable in any meaningful way.
I grew up with many people who went to top schools (in Canada and abroad) and became doctors, lawyers, consultants, bankers etc. and while nearly all of these people have good jobs, none of these people seem to be on the path of achieving real wealth or notoriety. Very few of this group are even working in jobs that would be considered high paying or prestigious in the American context. Perhaps this group will achieve more success in the future, but it seems that even the most successful in Toronto don’t have the opportunities to become rich or influential.
I know a few people who are rich and influential in so far as they work in their family businesses, a few more who are instagram influencers based on their appearance, and a few more micro-celebrities in localized communities. But of the actual people who became rich and influential, the list is composed of very different people than I would have expected.
I know a famous musician and an oscar nominated director, neither were viewed as precocious youths, or even today, despite their fame, as being particularly gifted. In contrast, there were lots of artsy people I grew up with that everyone thought were incredibly talented who never found success.
I know several people who founded moderately successful companies, none of whom were people viewed as being particularly smart, talented or likely to succeed while growing up. In fact, one person who founded a venture backed YC start-up was someone people were actively concerned about their future.
In contrast, none of the people I would have bet, the smart and hardworking conventional types, have become “somebodies”.
Three observations I have:
The first is that being smart, hardworking and conventional selects almost against this type of success. Anyone in my community who had the opportunity to go to a top school and get a prestigious job, did so. As a result, they dedicated their lives to pursuing this demanding career path, which left little room for other opportunities/exploration.
The second is that a very large number of people I know who became successful did so after moving to the US (NY/SF) and had their pathways altered there. This isn’t because the rich or talented moved to the US (almost all of the people I’m describing came from rich enough families to have moved to the US), it’s mostly the people who weren’t sufficiently engaged in their pathway in Toronto that moving to the US seemed like a worthwhile distraction.
The third is just how much luck and randomness was involved. To the point that in my honest observation, there is essentially no correlation between success and talent amongst those I know.
I suppose this is all tautologically necessary. Very few people are going to become rich and influential, especially so by their early 30s. Those that do are almost certainly going to have weird trajectories and be exceptionally lucky. While all of this makes sense, I guess I just never appreciated this when I was younger, in particular, the difference of being in Canada and the USA and how actually following the local maximum for success pushes one away from the global maximum.
I’d be curious to hear from others in this community. Are the people you know who became successful those you expected? Any success stories that surprise you? Did you notice a difference between those who went to the USA/your home country or went to nyc/sf from your smaller city?
“The first is that being smart, hardworking and conventional selects almost against this type of success. Anyone in my community who had the opportunity to go to a top school and get a prestigious job, did so. As a result, they dedicated their lives to pursuing this demanding career path, which left little room for other opportunities/exploration.”
I think you hit the nail on the head with this one. So many people are not open to opportunities or experimentation.
I was what you would call a “gifted child”, started programming when I was 6 and studying computer science when I was 14. But I always experimented with different projects, tried to sell my software and eventually started making money doing online marketing- something completely unexpected. I doubled-down and made a considerable amount of money in the next 15 years. I had to adapt, of course, and move to different markets and opportunities but overall I did well (basically I semi-retired before I was 30)
But it required being open to opportunities and creating them myself. Had I just stuck to programming and the regular career path, I would’ve been now a CS PhD, maybe working at a prestigious company but nothing out of the ordinary. Many of my smart school peers who went to become doctors/programmers are not rich, as you can’t really become wealth if all you do is earn a salary. Maybe if you work for Google in the US for 10 years you can make some money. Otherwise it’s unlikely.
The regular path is boring and rarely leads someplace amazing. One has to be open to experiments, always check what trends are hot and try to jump on the current wave.